On reflection what could you have done differently to make sure that you achieved the module learning outcomes?

  • Home / General / On reflection what…

On reflection what could you have done differently to make sure that you achieved the module learning outcomes?

Critically discuss the benefits of mastering the art of literature review which includes: critiquing debating paraphrasing reflecting citation and referencing at higher education level.


Report Content and Structure:

Your(single)report should be a four-part document in which you are expected to include the following:

1.Reflections on your experience (20 Marks – maximumof 600words):Outline and discuss the reasons why you were unable to attain the PPR module

pass mark the first time round. Which aspects of the module did you find challenging?

On reflection what could you have done differently to make sure that you achieved the module learning outcomes?

a.Your reflective discussion should fully demonstrate how the PPR learning experience has been applied to your own understanding and learning.

b.You need to document what lessons have been learn as a result of your engagement and personal reflection.

c.You are expected to specifically address all aspectsof the module learning outcomes including the coursework assessments.

d.How do you intend to use the summative feedback givento you in the next semester?

e.To help you develop and write your reflection use the Gibb’s reflective model (1988 – http://bit.ly/pbSXEG):

  • Description: what happened?
  • Feelings: what were you thinking and feeling?
  • Evaluation: what was good and bad about the experience?What went welland what difficulties did you encounter?
  • Analysis: what sense did you make of the challengingsituations you faced?
  • Conclusion: what else could you have done?
  • Action plan: how would you apply this learning in future study or employment?

2.Critical evaluation a debatable statement (15 Marks-maximum of 450 words):Choose oneof the following statements and critically evaluate it. Use relevant sources to build and justify your arguments. You must cite your references.

1.Critically discuss the benefits of mastering the artof literature review whichincludes: critiquing debating paraphrasing reflectingcitation andreferencing at higher education level.

2.Discuss why it is essential for a level 4 studentto develop critical thinkingskills team working skills and oral presentation skills? You must discusseach skill mentioned separately.2

.Do you agree that“a large number of students failtheir modules (or courses)because they lack study and learning skills? Moreoften than not they don’teven realise it.” – argue for or against this statement.

.Produce a written research essay paper (50 Marks -maximum of 1000 words):You are to research and evaluate the benefits and drawbacksof learning and collaborating with peers online at higher education.Your essay paper must not exceed 1000 words. You mustsupply at least five credible sources where you got your information from.Students who only reference web blogs will score a low mark.

Thereforeit is in your interest to findgood journal articles and critically review and discuss them in your report. Yourreport must be written in your own words.Start by using the LSBU Library Search engine to look for academic/useful articles.

Guidance on how to use Library resources can be foundwhen you click on this weblink: -https://vle.lsbu.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=2169).4.Review of team working and project tools (15 Marks-maximum of 450 words):This section focuses mainlyon the coursework 1 teamwork. You are expected tocritically review the success of working withprojecttools and techniques.

1.Compare and contrast project planning tools with productdevelopment tools.

2.Discuss the value of creating and maintaining a personale-study logbookthroughout your undergraduate programme.

.Describe how the LSBU library services could supportstudents workingtogether on a group project.

Remember:Your submission is checked via Turnitinso do not copy and paste material from the internet.

Search for good journalarticles critique them cite themin the text and properly reference them in your referencesection. Failure to do thismay result in your work being subject to AcademicMisconduct Investigation (AMI).

Note:5 marks will be deducted from your overall markif youDO NOT name your file submission correctly like this: -studentID_retake.pdfReferencing:Harvard Referencing should be used see yourLibrarySubject Guidefor guides and tips onreferencing:https://libguides.lsbu.ac.uk/ld.php?content_id=2487069